Basilisk

For discussion of ship fittings
Post Reply
User avatar
Narthe Raytei
Member
Member
Posts: 576
Joined: 2013.01.21 11:59
Title: Graduate

Basilisk

Post by Narthe Raytei »

The two fits on the Wiki are as follows:

4-2 PvP Fleet AB
Spoiler
[Basilisk, 4-2 PvP Fleet AB]
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II

10MN Afterburner II
Large Shield Extender II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
EM Ward Field II
Conjunctive Gravimetric ECCM Scanning Array I

Damage Control II
Reactor Control Unit II

Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I


Light Shield Maintenance Bot II x5
4-2 PvP Fleet MWD
Spoiler
[Basilisk, 4-2 PvP Fleet MWD]
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter
Large 'Regard' Power Projector
Large 'Regard' Power Projector

50MN Cold-Gas Enduring Microwarpdrive
Large Shield Extender II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
EM Ward Field II
Conjunctive Gravimetric ECCM Scanning Array I

Damage Control II
Reactor Control Unit II

Medium Ancillary Current Router I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I


Light Shield Maintenance Bot II x5
These fits are pretty much fine (except from being incredibly out of date on the modules front), the only difference with what is here and what can be seen on the killboards is that these have (what is now called) a Sebo instead of an extra Extender. I think they're also out of date in terms of fitting since they seem to have a whole bunch extra powergrid with the Ancil Rig.

So, after comparing with the current killboard losses i'd propose these as updates:

PvP AB:
Spoiler
[Basilisk, AB]

Damage Control II
Mark I Compact Reactor Control Unit

Large Shield Extender II
Large Shield Extender II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
EM Ward Field II
10MN Afterburner II

Large S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Large S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Large S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Large S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Large 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Large 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter

Medium Core Defense Field Extender II
Medium Core Defense Field Extender II


Light Shield Maintenance Bot I x5
PvP MWD:
Spoiler
[Basilisk, MWD]

Damage Control II
Mark I Compact Reactor Control Unit

Large Shield Extender II
Large Shield Extender II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
EM Ward Field II
50MN Quad LiF Restrained Microwarpdrive

Large S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Large S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Large S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Large S95a Scoped Remote Shield Booster
Large 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter
Large 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter

Medium Core Defense Field Extender II
Medium Ancillary Current Router I


Light Shield Maintenance Bot I x5
Bling doesn't seem to be all that common for the losses; likely due to the fact that blingy active tank for shield is ludicrously expensive.
The difference between these new fits and the old ones is the removal of the Sebo and the addition of an extra Extender as it seems to be a common choice.

There's also a lack of Incursion fits, are these still being used in incursions or is the Scimi's now the better ship?
"The music does not play the musician." Daniel Jackson - Stargate SG1

Nothing to see here
User avatar
Arrek Lemmont
Member
Member
Posts: 217
Joined: 2014.07.22 12:29
Title: NSC Combat Officer, Mentor, Graduate

Re: Basilisk

Post by Arrek Lemmont »

Thanks - this is the only match I found for Basilisk on the forums!

The MWD version fits even with a Mark I Compact Power Diagnostic System instead of the Reactor Control Unit II, giving ever so slightly better shield and cap performance.
Former NSC Ship Supply Officer / Combat Officer / Mentor
User avatar
Gergoran Moussou
Member
Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 2019.04.09 05:16

Re: Basilisk

Post by Gergoran Moussou »

This is a Basilisk with MWD that I lost with Pandemic Horde yesterday. There's a compatible fit for people who only have Logistics Cruiser IV (train to V ASAP) which has an ancillary instead of one of the remote repairers. It's designed to need two capacitor transfers (typical practice with us is that the medium goes up and the large goes down in our capchain channel), so you can't use one of them to give combat cap and keep the primary's hardeners from getting neuted out or something. https://zkillboard.com/kill/89049329/

This is a Basilisk with AB that I lost with Rekking Crew back in April. Since the two cap transfers are the same size, it doesn't matter which one goes where, but one up/down is standard practice. However, with Logistics Cruiser V, you're stable with one transfer, so if your partner in one direction (you have to be clear that everyone's going in the same direction, with the other direction constantly capping a Basilisk) has the skill maxed (again, train to max ASAP), you can feed cap to people who need it other than the Basilisk chain, such as a primary whose hardenres are being neuted or a capital needing to reach jump cap. https://zkillboard.com/kill/83581283/
Former E-Uni FC (LSC/WHC).

Image
Post Reply