EVE University Forum

Raptors are slow and generally the worst combat inty. They don't quite have as many variations on fitting.

Standard blaster combat inty:

Spoiler

[Raptor, Blaster Combat Ion]

Micro Auxiliary Power Core I
Damage Control II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II

5MN Y-T8 Compact Microwarpdrive
Medium Shield Extender II
Warp Scrambler II
Fleeting Compact Stasis Webifier

Light Ion Blaster II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S
Light Ion Blaster II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S
Light Ion Blaster II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S

Small Processor Overclocking Unit I
Small Core Defense Field Extender II


Void S x1000
Null S x1000
Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S x1000
Nanite Repair Paste x100

Rails:

Spoiler

[Raptor, Combat Inty Rail]

Damage Control II
Micro Auxiliary Power Core II
Nanofiber Internal Structure II

5MN Y-T8 Compact Microwarpdrive
Warp Disruptor II
Medium Azeotropic Restrained Shield Extender
Fleeting Compact Stasis Webifier

125mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S
125mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S
125mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S

Small Hybrid Burst Aerator II
Small Hybrid Locus Coordinator I


Void S x1000
Null S x1000
Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S x1000
Nanite Repair Paste x50

White 0rchid wrote:Raptors are slow and generally the worst combat inty. They don't quite have as many variations on fitting.

Standard blaster combat inty:

Spoiler

[Raptor, Blaster Combat Ion]

Micro Auxiliary Power Core I
Damage Control II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II

5MN Y-T8 Compact Microwarpdrive
Medium Shield Extender II
Warp Scrambler II
Fleeting Compact Stasis Webifier

Light Ion Blaster II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S
Light Ion Blaster II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S
Light Ion Blaster II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S

Small Processor Overclocking Unit I
Small Core Defense Field Extender II


Void S x1000
Null S x1000
Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S x1000
Nanite Repair Paste x100

I've really tried to like this hull, and the above is optimized, yet still terrible. It's still highly limited on the engagements it can confidently take. Outrun by any other interceptor (combat and fleet), and out-kited or out-dps'd by any faction frigate, this ship and it's blaster fitting is going to have a bad time. However, I would say that a MASB would fare better with the scram/web setup.

White 0rchid wrote: Rails:

Spoiler

[Raptor, Combat Inty Rail]

Damage Control II
Micro Auxiliary Power Core II
Nanofiber Internal Structure II

5MN Y-T8 Compact Microwarpdrive
Warp Disruptor II
Medium Azeotropic Restrained Shield Extender
Fleeting Compact Stasis Webifier

125mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S
125mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S
125mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge S

Small Hybrid Burst Aerator II
Small Hybrid Locus Coordinator I


Void S x1000
Null S x1000
Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S x1000
Nanite Repair Paste x50

This fit is more viable than the above, and the rail/disruptor/OH'd web combo allows for some range/engagement dictation and compensates for the abysmal speed you get in the hull. No suggested changes.

Among the blaster fits in zkillboard I'm mostly seeing a trend of 2x Nanofiber Internal Structure IIs for Raptors.

Blaster Fit: How does the rail fit work? Reminds me of the Crusader beam losses fit with Aurora. I'm seeing losses of rail fit Raptors mostly with Spike loaded.

Updated fits on Fleet-up. Waiting on the sync to Wiki.