Thanks Biwako!
I would like to finalize this thread. For this first please familiarize with rules I would like to propose:
https://forum.eveuniversity.org/viewtop ... 6&t=104311 (comment in that topic please).
Assuming we will stick to my rules proposal I would like to reduce the amount of fits in the discussion.
Fleet Boosher
Comparing regular Raido's fit with b-ling I see difference: +2k EHP; +1% resist; +30M. Though I would close the kinetic hole by replacing Trimark rig by Anti-Kinetic.
I don't see reasonable usage for bling: people can always do that on their own.
And bigger question: why 1-burst CD at all? multi-burst has 30% less EHP (21.5k vs 28.4)... Is it better to fit 1-burst with more EHP? Otherwise, if getting 2 CD ... maybe get 1 CD with 2 links and get 1 more logy instead?
Fleet Multi-Burst
Raido's feet similar to my, only blinged for tank, has +2-4% resist, less DPS (no guns), and costs +20M
I assume CDs purpose is to boost fleet, not to bring DPS...
Small Gang Boosher
I think we should not recommend such fit: boosher is not effective solo and needs fleet support. If it has fleet support, it needs Burst modules, not dps.
Solo Fit
Ability to tank 330 dps is great, but 230 DPS... it is same as Confessor, but has no web, needs cap and drones.
Is this viable? Should we post this?
I see how it could work in a small kitchen-sink (brawling?) fleet.
Snatch Fit
Not sure what's the purpose of it? How is it better than "Fleet Boosher" ability to have a logy in fleet? I feel CD should be used as boosher/burst.
Proposed summary is to stick to:
1) Raido's Fleet Boosher => rename to Pontifex: Fleet Boosher. But again, is 1-burst CD makes any benefits?
2) Raido's Fleet Multi-Burst => rename to Pontifex: Fleet Multi-Burst
3) Solo Fit => rename to Pontifex: Solo PvP
Any feedback?