[WHC] A Rorqual's worth of Titus salt
Posted: 2017.05.19 22:26
Forum for the EVE Online corporation 'EVE University'
http://forum.eveuniversity.org/
What bit about the "tactical situation" did we miss exactly?you didn't get a complete appreciation for the tactical situation
Yeah and somtimes you don't know what sarcasm is. While I too prefer a /s from time to time, this one is rather.. obvious. Painfully even.Marius Labo wrote:Great FC'ing... blame game mechanics, blame CCP, blame "nullsec", blame everyone but yourself or the fact you didn't get a complete appreciation for the tactical situation, lol. Shit happens sometimes, sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes the bear eats you
What part are you speaking of? If you link the thread already, it would be really helpful if you could also quote the part you have a problem with. I like reading lots of stuff, but srsly? Is it too hard to use [.quote][./quote]? The last sentence reminded me of this oneAs a former military tactician I have seen you call out in other threads about that FCs needing to adopt more real-world military tactical thinking. I can tell that you don't have that professional training or experience. I do, in case you didn't know.
Now, does all of that apply to, or need to be a requirement in internetpixelspaceships? No, but some basic stuff is definitely a plus.
FCs make the best tactical decisions based on "the ground", the weapons (doctrines, fleet composition, combat admin states), and "the men". Tactics is simply the application of men and weapons to the ground.
Yeah but.. why does this "combat appreciation" come from someone who wasn't even on grid? Also, rtfw(read the f***ing words). If you can't see sarcasm that's so obvious.. I can't help it.FCs should make the best combat appreciations they can, so that they can better understand how to apply tactics. It's that simple.
If you don't understand a proper combat appreciation you're going to miss things and that will adversely affect your tactical decisions. It's clear by your own words, that you lacked some integral facts in your combat appreciation. Quit blaming CCP, game mechanics, and the other side for your missed opportunities. In short, get over yourself . Cut the blame-game out of your AARs, and just stick to what happened and what you learned.
Ohoo, making it personal is always good. Well, he might be a sarcastic poster from time to time, but you are definitivly a sour poster. See here. "But the directors!".What I learned is that you're one sour individual if a fight doesn't go your way.
Oh idk, while his post is not a good AAR, your's isn't helping either. If you wanted to correct him, you could point out what they could have done instead.Seriously, though, I would think as the Uni Dir of Education, an AAR like this isn't really befitting of your station or what you represent. Git gud
What on earth did I just read? Personal attacks aren't really appropriate.Marius Labo wrote:...
Yea Titus, learn how to tactishon!Marius Labo wrote:summin summin tactishon